top of page

Note: the reflection on this concept of citizen was written honestly from my current perspective and based on the experience during the immersion.

Before the PASEC program, my definition of a responsible citizen was limited to following the law, paying taxes, and voting. I saw it as a set of obligations rather than an active choice to contribute to the well-being of others. It was a passive role centered on individual compliance.

Section 01

Class product and reflection

The product I chose to improve was my final reflection on the experience at ASONIC. I chose it because it pushed me to think beyond activities — to connect what I lived with bigger questions about empathy, inequality and privilege. Improved version of the product This semester I had the opportunity to accompany children and adolescents at ASONIC, the Ecuadorian Association of Parents of Children and Adolescents with Cancer. Arriving at service each day involved a mix of excitement, nerves and responsibility. At first I observed a lot: how the kids organized themselves, how they interacted with each other, what they needed that day. Little by little I integrated into the activities — games, supervised homework, values workshops, organizing the playroom — and I stopped thinking of service as "going to help" and started seeing it as a space where I learned as much as I contributed. One moment marked me especially. One of the kids was distant and distrustful at first. He didn't participate much. Instead of pressuring him, I tried to approach him calmly and give him space. After a while he started to respond, to participate, and even to show trust. That moment taught me that impact isn't always visible in big immediate changes. Sometimes it's in small gestures: a child smiling, asking something, feeling safe with you. I learned that with this population — children who often face long medical treatments, hospitalizations and fears most adults can't even understand — patience and presence are worth more than any well-planned activity. The biggest challenge was learning not to take reactions personally. When a kid didn't want to participate, I'd get frustrated at first. Over time I understood that behind a difficult attitude there's almost always tiredness, fear, physical pain or a situation I don't know about. I learned to observe before acting and to be flexible with my expectations. But the deepest lesson came from questioning my own privileges. Having had the opportunity to study at USFQ and to participate in an international program at Cornell made me see clearly that access to opportunities is not equal for everyone. I don't say this from guilt, but from responsibility. ASONIC is not a place where I went to "give"; it's a place where I learned that the families and kids I worked with have agency, dignity and full rights, and that my role was to accompany, not rescue. Today I understand service as a practice of conscious citizenship: using what I learn to contribute better, without paternalism, listening before proposing. Written reflection What did I learn? I learned that community service isn't about "helping from above," but about being present, listening, and recognizing the dignity and rights of the people we work with. I learned that patience is not passivity — it's an active form of respect — and that with children and adolescents living with complex medical realities, the most valuable thing one can offer is genuine attention and consistency. I also learned to question the idea that people in vulnerable situations need others to decide for them; on the contrary, they have the same right as anyone to define what they want and need. Why was this learning meaningful to me? It was meaningful because it forced me to confront my own prejudices. I came to ASONIC with the idea, perhaps not consciously, that I was going to "contribute something" to kids who needed help. I left understanding that my role was much more humble: to accompany, to support, to learn. The experience connected with deep things about how I see myself in the world — especially when contrasting my opportunities, like having studied at Cornell, with very different realities other families live in Ecuador. That contrast didn't leave me with guilt; it left me with responsibility. How did it impact me? Was it personal or professional? The impact was both. On a personal level, it changed how I relate to people in general: I learned to observe more, assume less, and ask with real curiosity instead of projecting what I think the other person needs. It questioned my tendency to want to "solve" everything and taught me that sometimes the most valuable contribution is simply being there. Professionally, this changed how I see my future in Human Resources. I no longer just want to be efficient designing talent policies; I want to be a professional who recognizes that behind every employee there are family, medical and emotional realities that companies frequently ignore. I want to bring what I learned at ASONIC into the corporate world: real care policies, not just wellness rhetoric.

Key Learnings

The program highlighted that responsibility is built through dialogue and understanding different life experiences. I learned that silence can be as harmful as action when it comes to social injustice.

Personal Growth

By comparing my previous view with my current one, I see a shift from a compliant individual to an engaged community member. This growth allows me to approach civic action with more purpose and less hesitation.

Section 02

Reflection on responsible citizenship

Previous definition (reconstructed)

At the beginning of the PASEC course, my definition of responsible citizenship was fairly traditional. I associated it with following rules, respecting others, voting, recycling, not polluting, and helping when possible. I saw it as a series of correct individual behaviors  being a good person, doing no harm, collaborating when one could more than as an active stance toward social reality. I also understood it as something a bit external to me: a moral or civic obligation, more than a personal commitment to community. I didn't connect it with words like inequality, inclusion, privilege, rights or structural barriers.

Note:

I no longer have the original document of my previous definition, so this reconstruction is honest and approximate to what I thought when I started the course.

Comparison between the two definitions What changed and why? What changed most was the center of gravity of my definition. My initial version was centered on me: on what I do well, on the rules I follow, on the help I give. My new definition is centered on the relationship between people and on the structures that surround them. It's no longer about "being a good person"; it's about not being indifferent to realities that society often normalizes. My relationship with the word "help" also changed. Before, I thought helping was the heart of citizenship. Now I think that helping badly from paternalism, from the idea that one has something the other lacks  can be as harmful as doing nothing. The experience at ASONIC showed me that the families and kids I worked with don't need me to decide for them what they're missing; they need me to listen, respect them, and recognize their full rights. This was a deep change: I went from seeing service as "giving" to seeing it as "being with" and "learning from." Lastly, my awareness of privilege changed. Before, it was an abstract word. After ASONIC and contrasting my access to opportunities like my time at Cornell with the reality of other Ecuadorian families, I understood that privilege is not something one chooses, but it is something one can use with responsibility or ignore with comfort. What stayed the same and why? What stayed was the idea that citizenship implies action, not just belonging. I always thought that being a citizen isn't only about having a nationality, but about doing something with it. That didn't change, but it deepened: now I know that this action must be conscious, informed, and at the service of more just relationships, not just well-intentioned individual acts.

NEW DEFINITION

New definition Being a responsible citizen, for me, is no longer about following rules or doing good deeds out of duty. It is about not being indifferent. It is being aware that I live in an unequal society, recognizing my own privileges without guilt but with responsibility, and using what I have  time, education, opportunities  to build more inclusive, accessible and respectful spaces. Being a responsible citizen is listening before acting, questioning the narratives that assume some people "need help" and others have a duty to "give it," and recognizing that every person  regardless of their situation has the same rights and the same capacity to decide about their life as I do.

"Before I used to think community partners were vulnerable or in need; now I think com. partners are privileged and they also have the right to do all they want like us."

Source: Class whiteboard, PASEC Service Learning

Section 03

Three values that guide my civic action

I didn't choose them from a list. I identified them because they're already shown in concrete moments of my service at ASONIC.

03 Presence (active listening) Why it matters Presence is the difference between being physically in a place and really being there. In community service it's easy to do the activities without being truly connected to the people. Presence implies full attention, listening without interrupting, genuine eye contact, and the willingness to be affected by what the other person lives. Without presence, any volunteering becomes mechanical. How I applied it during service At first I went to service with the mindset of "completing the day's activities." Over time I understood that kids immediately notice if you're really present or just going through the motions. When a child told me something — even while doing homework or playing — I learned to stop what I was doing, look at them and really listen. Small gestures: stop moving papers, make eye contact, don't rush the conversation. That transformed the quality of the bonds I was able to form with them.

01 Empathy Why it matters Without empathy, any service action becomes a projection of what I think the other person needs, instead of a response to what they actually live. In contexts like ASONIC, where children and their families face complex medical, emotional and economic realities, assuming what they feel is not only useless but potentially disrespectful. Empathy forces me to stop, observe and listen before acting. How I applied it during service The clearest situation was when one of the kids was reserved and distant. Instead of pressuring him to participate or taking his silence as rejection, I decided to give him space, talk to him calmly and let him set the pace. After a while he began to open up and participate. Applying empathy there didn't mean doing something grand; it meant controlling my own anxiety to "produce results" and respecting his time.

  1. Valor 02 – Humility (non-assistencialism)

02 Humility (non-assistencialism) Why it matters Assistencialism — that impulse to "help the poor little one" — can do more harm than good. It reproduces inequality, takes agency away from people, and leaves the volunteer feeling virtuous without having transformed anything. Humility forces us to recognize that the communities we work with are not passive recipients of our goodwill, but people with rights, knowledge and their own decision-making capacity. How I applied it during service The class conversation in which we wrote that "community partners are privileged and have the right to do whatever they want, like us" was a turning point. From there I stopped thinking in terms of "I give, they receive." I started seeing myself as someone who was there to accompany, not to rescue. That changed small but important things: how I listened, how I asked questions, how I accepted that certain decisions were not mine to make.

Student

Digital Portfolio Scholar

Program

PASEC 2026

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world."

— Nelson Mandela

SECTION 04

Two personal commitments

Compromiso 1 — Como estudiante

AS A STUDENT

Commitment 1 — As a Student

As a student, I commit to integrating a more human, inclusive, and socially aware perspective into my academic work, especially when I analyze topics related to people, organizations, mental health, education, or inequality.I do not want what I learned through PASEC and ASONIC to remain only as a semester experience. I want it to influence the way I study, write, research, and understand social problems.

How will I know if I fulfilled this commitment? Measurable indicators:

I will know I fulfilled this commitment if, during the rest of my academic career:• I include a social or inclusive perspective in at least three major academic assignments.• I participate in at least one activity, talk, volunteer opportunity, or project related to inclusion, mental health, or social responsibility.• I use sources or research related to inequality, inclusion, or well-being in my assignments whenever the topic allows it.• I am able to explain how my university education connects to real community issues, not only to theory.

Four concrete actions to achieve it:

01

Choose assignment or project topics that include social issues, inclusion, or well-being.

02

Look for readings or sources about mental health, inequality, disability, chronic illness, or inclusion.

03

Participate at least once in a university activity related to service, community, or social responsibility.

04

Reflect after each important project on what impact it could have on real people, not only on my grade.

AS A FUTURE HR PROFESSIONAL

Commitment 2 — As a Future HR / Organizational Psychology Professional

As a future Human Resources or Organizational Psychology professional, I commit to promoting more human, inclusive, and sensitive workplaces that recognize employees’ personal realities. After ASONIC, I think much more about the fact that people do not come to work separated from their personal lives. Some employees may be dealing with illness, family problems, caregiving responsibilities, mental health struggles, or children with medical conditions. As a future professional, I do not want to see people only as ā€œtalentā€ or ā€œproductivity,ā€ but as complete human beings.

How will I know if I fulfilled this commitment? Measurable indicators:

I will know I fulfilled this commitment if, in my professional life, I am able to: • Participate in the creation or improvement of at least one employee well-being, inclusion, or support policy. • Propose measures that consider mental health, flexibility, or complex family situations. • Evaluate talent without ignoring people’s socioeconomic, emotional, or personal context. • Receive feedback from employees or collaborators who feel they were heard and treated with dignity.

Four concrete actions to achieve it:

01

Continue learning about workplace mental health, inclusion, and organizational well-being.

02

Promote more human recruitment and selection processes, avoiding judging people only by opportunities they may not have had.

03

Support flexibility policies or leave options for employees with family responsibilities, sick children, or complex medical situations.

04

Actively listen to employees before making decisions that affect their well-being or performance.

Section 05

VĆ­deo el 3-5-26 a las 2.12 #2.mov

E-Portfolio · PASEC Service Learning María Elisa Eguiguren Ferri · Universidad San Francisco de Quito · 2026 85 hours · ASONIC · Children & adolescents

bottom of page